Pam Bricker . Pam Bricker .

Petition Approved: Signature Drive launched to Repeal Bad $1B Deal

GREELEY, CO — June 27, 2024 - The Greeley Deserves Better campaign announced today that the Greeley City Clerk has officially approved the petition form to repeal the “Bad Cascadia Deal” in Greeley Ordinance 2025-15, clearing the way for volunteers to begin collecting signatures immediately.

Ordinance 2025-15 authorizes a $1.1 billion financing plan for the Cascadia West entertainment district that mortgages 46 public buildings and exposes Greeley citizens to long-term debt and risk—$25-30 million annually regardless of project success.

Volunteers with the campaign will begin collecting signatures this weekend at the Greeley Stampede and continue throughout the city at coffee shops, grocery stores, and community events over the coming weeks.

Today's approval finally gives Greeley voters a voice in this billion-dollar decision,” said campaign co-chair and local business leader Dan Wheeler. “Now that we have the green light, we’re hitting the ground running to ensure voters have the chance to reject this risky deal at the ballot box.”

“We’ve heard from hundreds of residents who are ready to sign — and now they can,” said Pam Bricker, longtime downtown business leader and co-chair of the campaign. “This is about protecting taxpayers, our budget, our future and our community’s voice.”

“We’ll be out in every corner of Greeley — from the Stampede to your favorite coffee shop,” said May Monahan, co-chair of the signature gathering effort. “We're excited to meet our neighbors at the Stampede and throughout the community to explain why this deal puts our city and fellow citizens at unnecessary risk. If you care about transparency, fiscal responsibility, and fairness, sign the petition and join us.”

The campaign has until August 6 to collect the 4653 signatures required to place the repeal on the November 2025 ballot.

Community members interested in volunteering to help collect signatures are encouraged to sign up at the campaign’s website: www.greeleydeservesbetter.com.

The campaign continues to build momentum after a recent poll showed that 87% of likely Greeley voters support repealing the “Bad Cascadia Deal” in Ordinance 2025-15 after learning key facts about the deal.  92% believe the developer should provide financial guarantees, and 69% oppose the current financing approach altogether.

Read More
Pam Bricker . Pam Bricker .

Campaign Launches Initiative to Repeal Risky Cascadia Financing Deal

Petition Drive Begins Following Strong Polling Support

Signature Gathering will Start Next Week through August 6th

GREELEY, CO - June 17, 2025 - Today, a coalition of concerned Greeley citizens filed an initiative to repeal Ordinance 2025-15, which exposes taxpayers to over $1 billion in financial risk and unlimited liability for the controversial Cascadia West Greeley Project. The ordinance authorized the City to mortgage 46 essential public buildings—including City Hall, Police Department, and Fire Stations —as collateral for the private development. The campaign, operating under the name "Greeley Deserves Better," will begin collecting petition signatures upon approval of the petition form by the Greeley City Clerk, with a deadline of August 6th to qualify for the November ballot. 

The initiative comes after recent comprehensive and scientific polling by Pulse Decision Science showed strong public support for reconsidering the financing arrangement.  After learning details about the deal's financial terms and risks to taxpayers, 87% of likely municipal voters supported repeal.

Community Leaders Unite for Fiscal Responsibility

The campaign is co-chaired by Pam Bricker, former Executive Director of the Greeley Downtown Development Authority and founding member of the Greeley Creative District, and Dan Wheeler, a a multi-generational Greeley real estate leader with Wheeler Managmement Group, Inc.  Both bring decades of experience in community development and fiscal management to the effort.

"After 30 years of working to build up this community, I've seen what happens when we make smart investments versus risky gambles," said Bricker. "This deal asks Greeley taxpayers to shoulder over $1 billion in risk while guaranteeing a private developer millions in profits regardless of whether the project succeeds. Greeley deserves better than a deal that puts our police stations, fire houses, and City Hall at risk to subsidize someone else's business venture."

Wheeler emphasized the campaign's focus on community unity: "This isn't about being anti-development or anti-progress. This is about ensuring that any major financial commitment of this magnitude serves the broader community and includes appropriate protections for taxpayers. When one developer gets guaranteed profits while taxpayers hold all the risk, it’s time to say: Greeley deserves better.”

Polling Reveals Strong Public Opposition to Current Deal

The initiative follows comprehensive polling that revealed significant concerns among Greeley voters:

  • 69% oppose the current financing approach after learning details

  • 92% believe the developer should be required to invest their own money or provide financial guarantees

  • 78% would be willing to sign a petition to put repeal on the ballot

  • 87% support repeal after hearing arguments from both sides

The polling also showed that 68% of voters would be less likely to support candidates who voted for the financing deal, and 87% consider the issue important in determining their November votes.

Key Concerns Drive Citizen Action

The campaign identifies several critical issues with the current financing structure:

Financial Risk to Taxpayers: The deal exposes Greeley citizens to unlimited liability exceeding $1 billion, with no cap on financial obligations if the project underperforms.

Essential Buildings at Risk: 46 critical city buildings, including City Hall, Police Department, and Fire Stations, have been mortgaged as collateral and could be lost if the city cannot meet debt obligations.

Developer Protected from Risk: While taxpayers bear all financial risk, the developer receives guaranteed fees of $25-30 million regardless of project success and provides no financial guarantees.

Deferred Infrastructure Needs: Essential projects like Recreation Center renovations ($250 million) and a new City Hall ($125-160 million) are being postponed to finance the entertainment district.

Democratic Process and Community Input

“Our city’s most valuable public assets are being used as collateral — and the public never got a vote,” said Pam Bricker, co-chair and longtime advocate for downtown Greeley. “We’re not against development. We’re against bad deals. Repealing this ordinance gives Greeley the chance to renegotiate a smarter, fairer plan. Our polling confirms that Greeley residents believe they deserve better than having this rushed through without adequate input."

The campaign emphasizes that repealing the ordinance doesn’t need to kill the project entirely but would force renegotiation of terms more favorable to taxpayers and potentially require a public vote on any revised proposal.

Signature Gathering Begins Next Week

Citizens will find petition signature gatherers at Greeley Stampede events starting next weekend and throughout the festival. The campaign must collect the required number of valid signatures by August 6th to qualify the repeal measure for the November municipal ballot.

"We're asking our fellow Greeley citizens to take a few minutes to learn about this deal and sign our petition if they agree that Greeley deserves better," said Wheeler. "This is about ensuring that major financial decisions serve our entire community, not just private developers."

Building a Better Future Together

The campaign stresses its commitment to Greeley's growth and development while advocating for responsible fiscal management.

"We all want Greeley to thrive and grow," said Bricker. "But growth should strengthen our community, not put our most essential services and buildings at risk. There's a better way to support development that doesn't require taxpayers to guarantee a private developer's profits while taking on unlimited liability.".

Read More